[syslinux] mboot.c32/Xen compatible
Chris Fanning
christopher.fanning at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 03:39:56 PDT 2007
Hi,
> In general, if you want to be on the safe side, I would go with an Intel
> card. Their PXE stack is very mature, and their cards are flash
> upgradeable should you have a problem.
Thanks.
> But obviously, yes, it should work either way. I would be very
> interested in the *exact* failure mode,
I have two of these 3c905CX-TXM (03-0247-000 E) installed on two different pc's.
When they boot, initrd gets loaded and then they freeze with.
Booting: MBI=0x000100c0, entry 0x00100000
and the other box
Booting: MBI=0x000100a8, entry 0x00100000
I hope that is what you're looking for.
Thankyou once again.
Chris.
On 3/15/07, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:
> Ram Yalamanchili wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I dont know the answer, but to clarify the network card isn't related
> > to mboot module. Thats part of the pxelinux's UNDI driver I believe.
> >
>
> Actually, PXELINUX talks to PXE, not to UNDI (fine distinction, I know.)
>
> But obviously, yes, it should work either way. I would be very
> interested in the *exact* failure mode, but in your case it was probably
> PXE stack version dependent; 3Com had a lot of problems in the early
> versions of their PXE code.
>
> In general, if you want to be on the safe side, I would go with an Intel
> card. Their PXE stack is very mature, and their cards are flash
> upgradeable should you have a problem.
>
> -hpa
>
>
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list