[syslinux] [PATCH 12/23] com32/chain: cleaner variable names
Shao Miller
sha0.miller at gmail.com
Thu Nov 8 08:18:30 PST 2012
On 11/5/2012 19:32, Michal Soltys wrote:
> diff --git a/com32/chain/partiter.c b/com32/chain/partiter.c
> index da96b3d..14e74de 100644
> --- a/com32/chain/partiter.c
> +++ b/com32/chain/partiter.c
> @@ -302,16 +302,14 @@ static int prep_base_ebr(struct part_iter *iter)
>
> if (iter->dos.bebr_index0 < 0) /* if we don't have base extended partition at all */
> return -1;
> - else if (!iter->dos.bebr_start) { /* if not initialized yet */
> + else if (!iter->dos.bebr_lba) { /* if not initialized yet */
> dp = ((struct disk_dos_mbr *)iter->data)->table + iter->dos.bebr_index0;
>
> - iter->dos.bebr_start = dp->start_lba;
> - iter->dos.bebr_size = dp->length;
> + iter->dos.bebr_lba = dp->start_lba;
> + iter->dos.bebr_siz = dp->length;
>
> - iter->dos.ebr_size = iter->dos.bebr_size;
> -
> - iter->dos.cebr_lba = 0;
> - iter->dos.nebr_lba = iter->dos.bebr_start;
> + iter->dos.nebr_lba = dp->start_lba;
> + iter->dos.nebr_siz = dp->length;
>
> iter->index0--;
> }
The last two change-lines in this hunk appear to do more than just
change to using "cleaner variable names." Is this a copy'n'paste error
from the two change-lines that came before?
- Shao Miller
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list