[syslinux] 'implicit' doesn't prevent additional parameters?

[H. Peter Anvin]

Josef Siemes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>>Yes -- the "implicit" statement doesn't prevent you from adding command
>>line parameters, it just keeps you from specifying a kernel that isn't
>>listed as a label.
> 
> how much work would it be to prevent command line parameters? Say,
> e.g. with 'implicit 2'? I consider this a useful feature.
> 

Probably not too much work, but I'd have to look at the code.  The 
command-line parsing code (unlike the configuration-file parsing code) 
isn't yet unified, so it probably has to wait for that.  It was pretty 
much next on my list anyway...

	-hpa