[syslinux] tftp-hpa performance?

[H. Peter Anvin]

Dyks, Axel (XL) wrote:
>>>
>> Why?
> 
> Which part is "why?" refering to?
> 
> * standalone is prefered: less overhead
>   // ... assuming that in the poster's case (xinetd's) security/tcp-wrapper features
>   // are less important than having maximum performance / mininum latency)
> 
> * distro's default config: It's default on gentoo, don't know much about others
> 

Given how tftp-hpa works, the extra overhead is negible, and in fact
approaches zero for a busy enough server.

	-hpa