[syslinux] Interest in NTFS
Andreas Kotes
count-linux at flatline.de
Tue Jun 3 02:10:40 PDT 2008
Hello,
* Andreas Kotes <count-linux at flatline.de> [20080603 10:46]:
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> [20080602 22:55]:
> > Andreas Kotes wrote:
> > > I think VFAT long filenames are more worthwhile ...
> >
> > I think this is probably the right sequence of priorities.
> >
> > The biggest issue with VFAT long file names -- and I suspect NTFS has
> > the same thing -- is that they use Unicode (UTF-16) filenames, and
> > case-insensitive to boot, which are hard to handle correctly in a pre-OS
> > environment.
>
> Oy - I thought the patent issues where the biggest problem?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#FAT_licensing .. we
> in Europe don't necessarily need to care, but it may be a different
> matter in the US?
Just read up a bit more on it - I think syslinux can ignore them for the
same reason Linux does - interoperability.
I Am Not A Lawyer, and this can of course only be decided in court by a
judge - so it could be good to be aware of this problem.
Br,
Andreas
--
flatline IT services - A.Kotes - IT-consulting for ISPs & Internet services
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list