[syslinux] Syslinux Project versus its components

[Sebastian Herbszt]

Kevin Landreth wrote:
> I Like the naming convention except for "SYSLINUX for FAT" because that
> recreates a bit of recursion in naming such as "The SYSLINUX project
> consists of SYSLINUX for FAT ... "

"The Syslinux Project consists of SYSLINUX for FAT ... "

> I understand that it is where the project originated but since you've moved
> a lot out into com32 modules and into different internal libraries, wouldn't
> it be best to move the Syslinux name as the project and rename syslinux
> tools to something else?  FATLINUX or something maybe?  Because at this
> point, I think most of the attention comes from syslinux for TOOLNAME and
> not use syslinux for PXE booting.

Maybe LDLINUX? After all it's called ldlinux.asm.

- Sebastian