[syslinux] Syslinux Project versus its components
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Tue Oct 28 10:43:57 PDT 2008
Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> My biggest concern is that this will break every document and script that
> was using syslinux before. So if we want to call it fatlinux, we should
> still symlink the syslinux command.
>
> But I do think the name change would be better for consistency sake.
>
Yes, although you have to admit "fatlinux" sounds pretty crappy ;)
Either way, I'm reluctant to make more radical changes at this time,
especially due to the script breakage.
Of course, given my currently unemployed status, who knows what will
happen next.
-hpa
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list