[syslinux] COM32 module: Read-Only shell
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Mon Feb 16 09:06:13 PST 2009
Gene Cumm wrote:
>
> Ahh.. I was more refering to the ((void)0) which appears to be a GNU C
> extension. Now I'm searching around and having no luck at finding
> references to why I thought it was a GNU C extension.
>
It's not, either. ((void)0) is in fact valid C90 as well as C99.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list