[syslinux] COM32 module: Read-Only shell

H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor.com
Mon Feb 16 09:06:13 PST 2009


Gene Cumm wrote:
> 
> Ahh.. I was more refering to the ((void)0) which appears to be a GNU C
> extension.  Now I'm searching around and having no luck at finding
> references to why I thought it was a GNU C extension.
> 

It's not, either.  ((void)0) is in fact valid C90 as well as C99.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.




More information about the Syslinux mailing list