[syslinux] isohybrid question

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 07/02/2010 07:02 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> 
>> It's probably the partition start that's more important for
>> flaky C/H/S access.
> 
> I wonder how important or desirable it would
> really be to have a non-0 start of partition 1.
> 

There are some claims of boot failures with the 0-based MBR that
isohybrid uses by default.  However, without creating a whole separate
metadata tree that's the only way to get a valid iso9660 filesystem.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.