[syslinux] isohybrid question
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Fri Jul 2 09:20:21 PDT 2010
On 07/02/2010 07:02 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
>> It's probably the partition start that's more important for
>> flaky C/H/S access.
>
> I wonder how important or desirable it would
> really be to have a non-0 start of partition 1.
>
There are some claims of boot failures with the 0-based MBR that
isohybrid uses by default. However, without creating a whole separate
metadata tree that's the only way to get a valid iso9660 filesystem.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list