[syslinux] [PATCH 12/23] com32/chain: cleaner variable names

[Geert Stappers]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:32:46AM +0100, Michal Soltys wrote:
> [PATCH 12/23] com32/chain: cleaner variable names
> 
> diff --git a/com32/chain/partiter.c b/com32/chain/partiter.c
> index da96b3d..14e74de 100644
> --- a/com32/chain/partiter.c
> +++ b/com32/chain/partiter.c
> @@ -302,16 +302,14 @@ static int prep_base_ebr(struct part_iter *iter)
>  
>      if (iter->dos.bebr_index0 < 0)	/* if we don't have base extended partition at all */
>  	return -1;
> -    else if (!iter->dos.bebr_start) { /* if not initialized yet */
> +    else if (!iter->dos.bebr_lba) { /* if not initialized yet */
>  	dp = ((struct disk_dos_mbr *)iter->data)->table + iter->dos.bebr_index0;
>  
> -	iter->dos.bebr_start = dp->start_lba;
> -	iter->dos.bebr_size = dp->length;
> +	iter->dos.bebr_lba = dp->start_lba;
> +	iter->dos.bebr_siz = dp->length;
>  
> -	iter->dos.ebr_size = iter->dos.bebr_size;
> -
> -	iter->dos.cebr_lba = 0;
> -	iter->dos.nebr_lba = iter->dos.bebr_start;
> +	iter->dos.nebr_lba = dp->start_lba;
> +	iter->dos.nebr_siz = dp->length;
>  
>  	iter->index0--;
>      }

FWIW  So how I'm missing a line like
} +	iter->dos.nebr_lba = 0;


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
> And is there a policy on top-posting vs. bottom-posting?
Yes.