[syslinux] [PATCH 12/23] com32/chain: cleaner variable names

[Shao Miller]

On 11/8/2012 11:18, Shao Miller wrote:
> On 11/5/2012 19:32, Michal Soltys wrote:
>> diff --git a/com32/chain/partiter.c b/com32/chain/partiter.c
>> index da96b3d..14e74de 100644
>> --- a/com32/chain/partiter.c
>> +++ b/com32/chain/partiter.c
>> @@ -302,16 +302,14 @@ static int prep_base_ebr(struct part_iter *iter)
>>
>>       if (iter->dos.bebr_index0 < 0)    /* if we don't have base
>> extended partition at all */
>>       return -1;
>> -    else if (!iter->dos.bebr_start) { /* if not initialized yet */
>> +    else if (!iter->dos.bebr_lba) { /* if not initialized yet */
>>       dp = ((struct disk_dos_mbr *)iter->data)->table +
>> iter->dos.bebr_index0;
>>
>> -    iter->dos.bebr_start = dp->start_lba;
>> -    iter->dos.bebr_size = dp->length;
>> +    iter->dos.bebr_lba = dp->start_lba;
>> +    iter->dos.bebr_siz = dp->length;
>>
>> -    iter->dos.ebr_size = iter->dos.bebr_size;
>> -
>> -    iter->dos.cebr_lba = 0;
>> -    iter->dos.nebr_lba = iter->dos.bebr_start;
>> +    iter->dos.nebr_lba = dp->start_lba;
>> +    iter->dos.nebr_siz = dp->length;
>>
>>       iter->index0--;
>>       }
>
> The last two change-lines in this hunk appear to do more than just
> change to using "cleaner variable names."  Is this a copy'n'paste error
> from the two change-lines that came before?
>

Oops, I remembered that this was what Geert and you had discussed, 
already.  Sorry for the noise.  - Shao