[syslinux] Why such flagged email is allowed anyway?

[Geert Stappers]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:00:26PM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2012 3:42 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >Stappers considered the blut URL dropping as spam.
> > >He flagged the posting E-mail address as to be moderated.
> > >
> > >No hard feelings, nothing personal.
> > >
> > >Cheers
> > >Geert Stappers
> >
> > What I don't understand is, if the original email was flagged to be
> > moderated, then why it was allowed anyway? Clearly, it shouldn't had
> > been allowed, much less repeated.
> 
> I think Geert Stappers meant
> that all email from that address will now be moderated. 

Correct.


> Iirc, addresses that aren't subscribed and confirmed may not
> post without moderation.

Indeed. It is "subscribers only posting".


Groeten
Geert Stappers
- -- 
> And is there a policy on top-posting vs. bottom-posting?
Yes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlB+L9IACgkQOSINbgwa/7v9GQCcC7P/UVlwGAPZ+UNk+VV5GjD0
0wYAnAwvCjRiPRsDCvmnCu9YDYPEWXEp
=CqR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----