[syslinux] question

[Ady]

> 17 Jan 2013 :
>  
> 1_  Changed the second line to PROMPT 0
>  
> 3_changed line again to "DEFAULT vesamenu.c32
>  
> Boots Fine.  Actual boot entries also work.
>  

That's good news :).
 
Do you see any difference between vesamenu.c32 and menu.c32 when 
booting your "O:" drive? In your syslinux.cfg file, there are no 
directives that would make it behave differently on the screen. Since 
menu.c32 requires less resources than vesamenu.c32, then using 
menu.c32 instead of vesamenu.c32 makes sense to me. That is, unless 
you have chained to other Syslinux configuration files that would 
indeed require vesamenu.c32. So, just for curiosity, is there any 
difference?

> I have NO WORDS to thank you!!!
>  

You're welcome. Hopefully it will help you for your next Syslinux 
update too.

Best Regards,
Ady.