[syslinux] Allowed code pages and encodings to write f0.txt through f1.txt?

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 03/27/2013 01:56 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>>> The existence of Joliet in an ISO image is announced by [...]
>>> One would have to decide early, which one to use, if both are
>>> present.
> 
>> Quite correct.
> 
> "Quite" ? Did i misrepresent some facts ?

Sorry, I meant it in the British sense... saying "quite correct" is
means "correct indeed".

> I am pondering whether i should contribute a Rock Ridge name
> retriever function. But building a test frame for iso9660.c would
> be more effort than changing its code. Learning how to build ISOLINUX
> and to create a test case might become an even longer endeavour ...
> 
> Is anybody willing to do the testing part of Rock Ridge in ISOLINUX ?
> (With filenames which would not work with current ISOLINUX.)
> ((And then submit the patch in our both name ?))

If you write the patch I will be happy to test it if noone else will.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.