[syslinux] Syslinux 6.04-pre1
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Tue Mar 8 17:31:33 PST 2016
On March 8, 2016 4:54:35 PM PST, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 08.03.2016 23:53, Gene Cumm wrote:
>> On Mar 8, 2016 12:32 PM, "H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux"
><syslinux at zytor.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/08/16 09:19, poma wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You don't seem to understand how the packages distribution works,
>>>> in this particular case, for Fedora 22.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I know far too well, which is exactly why I'm none too happy to
>>> encourage these particular practices.
>>>
>>> -hpa
>>
>> Poma, in my opinion, this behavior means it's your/Fedora's
>responsibility
>> to propose a change that distinguishes between broken and working
>NASM
>> 2.11.06 or revert the commit in your/Fedora's build.
>>
>> --Gene
>>
>
>It doesn't mean Fedora "is mine" just because I want to improve it. :)
>I'm just a user vulgaris, certainly not representative of the Fedora,
>therefore, I cannot take any responsibility, even if I wanted to.
>I can somewhat help and I help when I can, but all this is a job for
>people who work and live from it, redhatistas.
>
>What I've tried here is to build the SYSLINUX across maintained Fedora,
>22 - 25,
>così semplice.
Now, there is nothing wrong about reverting this patch in the Fedora build, of course. A local patch for a local mod makes sense.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse brevity and formatting.
More information about the Syslinux
mailing list