[syslinux] chain.c32 (and partiter) updates v2

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 11/08/2012 09:51 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
> 
> Ah, the actual field. Indeed it had 'private'. For the record the aim
> was not C11, but some long present gcc extensions (and as -pedantic is
> not set, I assumed it was ok). There is at least one other non-standard
> thingy I used along the way (0b prefixed values). I'll clean that up too.
> 

I'm fine with using gcc anonymous structures/unions.

	-hpa